Over the previous few weeks, rumors have been multiplying that a number of pocket book producers are dissatisfied with the efficiency of the upcoming Meteor Lake notebooks. According to sources consulted by MLID, Meteor Lake presents no important efficiency enchancment over Raptor Lake. For the document, the Meteor Lake technology might be devoted solely to pocket book PCs, with said aims when it comes to effectivity and on-board graphics energy. We’ve already spoken at size in regards to the main upheaval that led to the creation of this technology at Intel. But let’s take a more in-depth have a look at this info, which, let’s not overlook, is just rumor at this stage.
Meteor Lake barely higher than Raptor Lake… So what?
So, the Core Ultra “Meteor Lake” processors might be barely higher than the prevailing Raptor Lake choices. New options could be focused on imprecise advertising and marketing statements about AI and the built-in NPU. Graphics, nevertheless, will take a quantum leap ahead, and these future processors may also be extra energy-efficient… Are we dealing with a scandal right here?
Objectively talking, there’s in all probability a purpose why Intel didn’t need to launch a desktop model of this technology. The stakes had been elsewhere. If we refocus on the pocket book market and the state of the competitors, providing efficiency on a par with Raptor Lake, with graphics which are ultimately passable and elevated autonomy, could be an actual step ahead. After all, who wants extra CPU efficiency lately? Is the competitors actually a risk to Intel… Not in X86 anyway.
The stakes are due to this fact going to lie extra in effectivity than in efficiency, and that’s the place this technology might be judged.
