While most motherboard manufacturers have intervened of their merchandise’ bios in an try and stem the proliferation of issues with the i9-13900K and i9-14900K, Intel has additionally determined to take an official stand. The first step has been to speak with its card producer companions. The blues are asking motherboard manufacturers to permit customers to run their processors to specification “by default” (i.e. with out intervention). In this context, Intel cites an entire sequence of potential tuning points that motherboard producers have just lately resolved on their very own duty. In the fundamental profile, nevertheless, the “Intel Recommended Settings” must be used.
Intel is asking system and motherboard producers to offer finish customers with a default BIOS profile that matches Intel’s really helpful settings.
- Intel strongly recommends that the shopper’s default BIOS settings guarantee operation in accordance with Intel’s really helpful settings.
- In addition, Intel strongly recommends that motherboard producers implement warnings for finish customers alerting them to any use of unlocked options or overclocking.
Monster cacophony surrounding the “fundamental profile
This reply, worthy of a communications skilled working in French political circles, means exactly the whole lot and nothing. After all, what does “Intel really helpful settings” actually imply? Let’s take one other have a look at Intel’s findings, which appear to have found the moon on sure topics…
Intel has noticed that this drawback could also be linked to working situations that don’t adjust to specs, leading to sustained excessive voltage and frequency during times of excessive warmth. Analysis of affected processors exhibits that some components are experiencing adjustments in minimal working voltages that could be associated to working outdoors Intel’s specified working situations[…]Although the basis trigger has not but been recognized, Intel has noticed that almost all of stories of this drawback are from customers with unlocked/overclocking-compatible motherboards.
In actuality, the topic is especially about energy consumption ceilings. The 125 watt processor, which was publicly detailed by Intel with PL1 = PL2 = 253 watts, was just lately capped by Asus within the base profile at precisely these higher limits and now not completely set to “limitless” (“4096 watts”). But issues are nonetheless unclear on this topic. Gigabyte has set 125/188 watts because the reference profile. But most suggestions means that the 125/188 watt profile isn’t actually what Intel desires to see as a brand new “reference”. The firm ought to make clear its place within the subsequent few days to place an finish to this cacophony.
- Intel will difficulty a public assertion on the standing of the problem and Intel’s really helpful BIOS configuration suggestions, scheduled for May 2024.
It could be wiser for Intel to present a fundamental really helpful profile and depart it as much as motherboard producers and customers to adapt the efficiency stage in keeping with their {hardware}, the standard of their CPU copy…and by the way their abilities.
